Model
Blomberg DHP24400W
Rank #21 means 20 of the 615 clothes dryer models we track cost less to run each year; the 95th efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 95% of those models.
What does the Blomberg DHP24400W cost to run per year?
Almost nothing we track in this class costs less to run than the Blomberg DHP24400W: about $28 a year, rank #21 of 615. Normalized for capacity, it ranks ahead of 95% of clothes dryer models we track on efficiency, an exceptional showing for the class. Its CEF of 5.7 reflects combined energy factor, one of the class's core efficiency levers.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Samsung DV22N680*H* at $27/yr runs a little cheaper and the Blomberg DHP24412W at $28/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A clothes dryer typically stays in service for somewhere around 13 years; over that span, the Blomberg DHP24400W's $28/yr adds up to roughly $364 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
Also sold as: Beko HPD24412W.
By the numbers
The Blomberg DHP24400W normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $28/yr, here is what the Blomberg DHP24400W adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Blomberg DHP24400W costs about $280. That is roughly $850 less than the class median, which would run closer to $1130 over the same ten years.
How the Blomberg DHP24400W compares
The clothes dryer class we track runs from $23 to $128 a year. At $28/yr, it runs about $85 a year cheaper than the class median of $113, and it is about $5 a year more than the cheapest clothes dryer to run at $23.
What drives its running cost
At 4.1 cu ft, the Blomberg DHP24400W is a small clothes dryer for its class, which spans 3.8 to 9.2 cu ft with a median of 7.4 cu ft, less capacity to service is usually the first reason a running-cost figure lands on the low side, before efficiency even enters the picture. Its CEF of 5.7, above the class median of 3.93, reflects combined energy factor: a higher figure means it wrings more useful work out of every kilowatt-hour, so it is the efficiency lever to weigh against raw size.
- Heat source and Combined Energy Factor (CEF). CEF combines drying performance with standby and off-mode energy use; for a given drum size, a higher CEF means less energy per pound of laundry dried, and heat-pump models usually post the highest figures in the class.
- Drum capacity. Drum capacity sets how much laundry one cycle can hold, and heating a bigger volume of air generally costs more energy per cycle.
Common questions
Is the Blomberg DHP24400W cheap to run?
Yes, relatively. At $28 a year it ranks #21 of 615 clothes dryer models we track, in the cheaper part of its class to run.
How much does the Blomberg DHP24400W cost per month?
Roughly $2.3/mo, spreading the $28/yr estimate evenly across twelve months at $0.1856/kWh. Actual monthly bills swing with your rate and usage pattern.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
We take the model's published annual energy use of 149 kWh from ENERGY STAR and multiply it by the US average residential electricity rate of $0.1856/kWh, giving about $28 a year. It is an electricity-only estimate and does not include purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Blomberg DHP24400W for its size?
95th percentile once size is factored in. That means its size-adjusted efficiency is a real factor in the running-cost figure above; its capacity plays a large role too.
Cheaper to run in the same class
| Rank | Model | Cost/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Samsung DV22N680*H*4 cu ft | $27 |
| 17 | Samsung DV22N685*H*4 cu ft | $27 |
| 16 | Asko T3HW.U4.2 cu ft | $26 |
| 15 | Lg WKHC152H*A4.2 cu ft | $25 |
| 14 | Miele TXD160WP4.1 cu ft | $25 |
Source
ES_1036108_DHP24400W_01202017210302_6182999View certified clothes dryer listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Blomberg and DHP24400W are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.