Model
Lg DLG6481*
Rank #500 means 499 of the 615 clothes dryer models we track cost less to run each year; the 6th efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 6% of those models.
What does the Lg DLG6481* cost to run per year?
Do the math and the Lg DLG6481*'s $127/yr puts it at rank #500 of 615, one of the costlier clothes dryer models we track to keep running. Normalized for capacity, it beats only 6% of clothes dryer models we track, one of the weaker efficiency results we track for the class. Its CEF of 3.49 reflects combined energy factor, one of the class's core efficiency levers.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Lg Signature DLGX9701* at $127/yr runs a little cheaper and the Whirlpool WGD9500EC* at $128/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A clothes dryer typically stays in service for somewhere around 13 years; over that span, the Lg DLG6481*'s $127/yr adds up to roughly $1651 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
Also sold as: Lg DLG6101*.
By the numbers
The Lg DLG6481* normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $127/yr, here is what the Lg DLG6481* adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Lg DLG6481* costs about $1270. That is roughly $140 more than the class median, which would run closer to $1130 over the same ten years.
How the Lg DLG6481* compares
The clothes dryer class we track runs from $23 to $128 a year. At $127/yr, it runs about $14 a year above the class median of $113, and it is about $104 a year more than the cheapest clothes dryer to run at $23.
What drives its running cost
At 7.3 cu ft, the Lg DLG6481* is a small clothes dryer for its class, which spans 3.8 to 9.2 cu ft with a median of 7.4 cu ft, at the small end of the class, capacity itself is doing a lot of the work to keep that figure down, separate from how efficient the unit actually is. The CEF of 3.49 on this model, below the class median of 3.93, measures combined energy factor; it is the number to compare directly against another model's CEF if capacity is similar.
- Heat source and Combined Energy Factor (CEF). CEF combines drying performance with standby and off-mode energy use; for a given drum size, a higher CEF means less energy per pound of laundry dried, and heat-pump models usually post the highest figures in the class.
- Drum capacity. Drum capacity sets how much laundry one cycle can hold, and heating a bigger volume of air generally costs more energy per cycle.
Common questions
Is the Lg DLG6481* cheap to run?
Not especially. At $127 a year it ranks #500 of 615 clothes dryer models we track, in the pricier part of its class to run, though its size and features may still justify that for your needs.
How much does the Lg DLG6481* cost per month?
Roughly $10.59/mo, spreading the $127/yr estimate evenly across twelve months at $0.1856/kWh. Actual monthly bills swing with your rate and usage pattern.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
We take the model's published annual energy use of 685 kWh from ENERGY STAR and multiply it by the US average residential electricity rate of $0.1856/kWh, giving about $127 a year. It is an electricity-only estimate and does not include purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Lg DLG6481* for its size?
6th percentile once size is factored in. That means its size-adjusted efficiency is not the main reason for the running-cost figure above; its capacity plays a large role too.
Cheaper to run in the same class
| Rank | Model | Cost/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 513 | Lg Signature DLGX9701*9 cu ft | $127 |
| 512 | Lg DLG3581*7.4 cu ft | $127 |
| 511 | Lg DLG3421*7.4 cu ft | $127 |
| 510 | Lg DLGX5801*7.4 cu ft | $127 |
| 509 | Lg DLG8201*7.3 cu ft | $127 |
Source
ES_1118034_DLG6481*_06052026100148_80303600View certified clothes dryer listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Lg and DLG6481* are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.