Model
Midea MAD50S1OWWCM
Rank #423 means 422 of the 519 dehumidifier models we track cost less to run each year; the 71st efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 71% of those models.
What does the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM cost to run per year?
The Midea MAD50S1OWWCM costs about $97 a year to run, well up the cost table for its class at rank #423 of 519. Size-adjusted, this model beats 71% of dehumidifier models we track on efficiency, better than most of its class. Its IEF of 2.01 reflects integrated energy factor, one of the class's core efficiency levers.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Midea MAD50PS1CWBL at $97/yr runs a little cheaper and the Midea MDUDA-50AEN8-BB0BF at $97/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A dehumidifier typically stays in service for somewhere around 8 years; over that span, the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM's $97/yr adds up to roughly $776 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
Also sold as: Black+Decker BDM50PWCDA.
By the numbers
The Midea MAD50S1OWWCM normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $97/yr, here is what the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM costs about $970. That is roughly $330 more than the class median, which would run closer to $640 over the same ten years.
How the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM compares
The dehumidifier class we track runs from $19 to $521 a year. At $97/yr, it runs about $33 a year above the class median of $64, and it is about $78 a year more than the cheapest dehumidifier to run at $19.
What drives its running cost
At 49.95 pints/day, the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM is a large dehumidifier for its class, which spans 1.91 to 172.13 pints/day with a median of 32.46 pints/day, and larger dehumidifier models generally cost more to run than smaller ones in the same class, simply because there is more to keep cold, spin, heat, or light. The IEF of 2.01 on this model, above the class median of 2.01, measures integrated energy factor; it is the number to compare directly against another model's IEF if capacity is similar.
- Integrated Energy Factor (IEF). IEF measures liters of water removed per kilowatt-hour; a higher IEF means less energy per pint of moisture removed for a given capacity.
- Water removal capacity (pints/day). A dehumidifier rated to remove more pints per day is built for a larger space or a more humid room, and generally draws more power to do it.
- Humidistat accuracy. A unit with a more precise humidistat cycles the compressor off once the target humidity is reached, rather than running continuously.
Common questions
Is the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM cheap to run?
Its $97/yr running cost, rank #423 of 519, is above what most dehumidifier models we track cost to run, so this is not one of the cheaper picks on electricity alone.
How much does the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM cost per month?
About $8.04 a month, which is the $97 annual estimate spread across twelve months at the US average rate of $0.1856/kWh. Your own bill scales with your local electricity rate and how heavily you use it.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
The formula is annual kWh times price per kWh: 520 kWh from ENERGY STAR times the US average of $0.1856/kWh comes to about $97 a year. It covers electricity only, not the purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Midea MAD50S1OWWCM for its size?
71st percentile once size is factored in. That means its size-adjusted efficiency is a real factor in the running-cost figure above; its capacity plays a large role too.
Cheaper to run in the same class
Source
ES_1138537_MAD50S1OWWCM_121920250525606_2338676View certified dehumidifier listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Midea and MAD50S1OWWCM are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.