Model
Samsung RF29DB9700**
Rank #954 means 953 of the 1,000 refrigerator models we track cost less to run each year; the 78th efficiency percentile means it uses less energy for its size than 78% of those models.
What does the Samsung RF29DB9700** cost to run per year?
At $131 a year to run, the Samsung RF29DB9700** is among the most expensive to run in its class, ranking #954 of 1,000 refrigerator models we track. It uses 5% less energy than the U.S. federal standard model in its class, which would cost about $137/yr to run, a saving of roughly $6 a year. Its 78th size-adjusted efficiency percentile is a step ahead of the class median, though not among the very top results. At 29 cu ft, it is a large refrigerator for the class, which runs 1.2 to 31.7 cu ft; size and efficiency are the two levers behind the figure above, and this dataset does not carry a separate efficiency-factor column for this class.
Immediately around it on the leaderboard, the Bosch B36FD51SN* at $130/yr runs a little cheaper and the Viking VCSB5423***** at $131/yr runs a little more, a sense of how tightly models are packed at this point in the ranking. A refrigerator typically stays in service for somewhere around 12 years; over that span, the Samsung RF29DB9700**'s $131/yr adds up to roughly $1572 in electricity alone, before purchase price or repairs.
By the numbers
The Samsung RF29DB9700** normalized against its whole class, so each figure means something.
What it costs you over time
Running cost is an every-year number, so it compounds. At $131/yr, here is what the Samsung RF29DB9700** adds up to before purchase price, water, or repairs enter the math.
Left running for a decade at today's US average rate, the Samsung RF29DB9700** costs about $1310. That is roughly $60 less than a standard model in its class, which would run closer to $1370 over the same ten years.
How the Samsung RF29DB9700** compares
The refrigerator class we track runs from $8 to $149 a year. At $131/yr, it runs about $67 a year above the class median of $64, and it is about $123 a year more than the cheapest refrigerator to run at $8. Against the US federal standard model for its class at about $137/yr, the Samsung RF29DB9700** uses 5% less energy.
What drives its running cost
At 29 cu ft, the Samsung RF29DB9700** is a large refrigerator for its class, which spans 1.2 to 31.7 cu ft with a median of 12.6 cu ft, size is usually the single biggest lever behind a running-cost figure, and at this end of the range there is more capacity to service, which tends to push the number up.
- Interior volume. Cubic feet of interior volume is the first thing that scales a fridge's running cost up or down, before compressor quality even enters the picture.
- Counter depth vs standard depth. Counter-depth models sit flush with cabinets but usually hold less interior volume than a standard-depth model of the same width, which can nudge the per-cubic-foot running cost either way.
- Compressor technology. Newer variable-speed (inverter) compressors modulate output instead of cycling fully on and off, which tends to use less energy for the same cooling job than an older fixed-speed compressor.
- Placement and ventilation. A fridge pushed tight against a wall or cabinet, or standing next to an oven or in direct sun, works harder to shed the heat its compressor produces, which can push real-world cost above the published figure.
Common questions
Is the Samsung RF29DB9700** cheap to run?
Not especially. At $131 a year it ranks #954 of 1,000 refrigerator models we track, in the pricier part of its class to run, though its size and features may still justify that for your needs.
How much does the Samsung RF29DB9700** cost per month?
Roughly $10.89/mo, spreading the $131/yr estimate evenly across twelve months at $0.1856/kWh. Actual monthly bills swing with your rate and usage pattern.
How is this running-cost figure calculated?
We take the model's published annual energy use of 704 kWh from ENERGY STAR and multiply it by the US average residential electricity rate of $0.1856/kWh, giving about $131 a year. It is an electricity-only estimate and does not include purchase price, water, or installation.
How efficient is the Samsung RF29DB9700** for its size?
78th percentile once size is factored in. That means its size-adjusted efficiency is a real factor in the running-cost figure above; its capacity plays a large role too.
Cheaper to run in the same class
| Rank | Model | Cost/yr |
|---|---|---|
| 953 | Bosch B36FD51SN*26.3 cu ft | $130 |
| 952 | Bosch B36FD10EN*26.3 cu ft | $130 |
| 951 | Ge GFE26JGM****25.6 cu ft | $130 |
| 950 | Lg LY24Z6231*23.7 cu ft | $130 |
| 949 | Lg LRFXC2606*25.5 cu ft | $130 |
Source
ES_1023593_RF29DB9700**_12122023095046_80192001View certified refrigerator listingsENERGY STAR data as of July 2026Samsung and RF29DB9700** are used here for identification only and are not endorsements. Figures are computed by WattWise Labs from public ENERGY STAR data, not measured in our own lab.